by definition faith is something we accept as true though is can not be proven.
i was thinking about the scripture defining faith at hebrews 11:1 "faith is the assured expectation of things hoped for.... ".
assured expectation = we are convinced something is true without proof.
People who have no faith..are easy to spot by their actions and the kind of decisions they make..especially those who abuse their authority and have faith that nobody is watching and keeping score just waiting to confront them with the evidence of their misconduct...to such a degree they don't even bother with preparing a defense for their actions.
Thats my opinion on it.
would our leadership be of better quality if they knew they would be held accountable for their decisions, orders and examples they set to their subordinates?
or are they confident/cocky they will never have to answer for their mistakes and do things the way they want to do them as a result of this perhaps shortsighted view on things?.
i mean who is going to police the police so to speak?.
When new better information surfaces...they will have no choice but to follow..or look real stupid.
A bad idea and those who follow it...will become followers to the one with superior knowledge or facts.
guesses follow facts..plain and simple.
are in turmoil?.
i have been watching my witness mother refuse to confront her many problems with my father and brothers...instead running out at every opportunity to knock on her nieghbor's doors and tell them how some men in new york think they should be living their lives and running their household, calling it the "truth"...all while anyone who knows her knows what a mess her home life is.. .
for one i think she should be a bit more selective on what she defines as truth..for two i don't think she can lead by example only empty hypocritical words.. .
When they get it right...they will grow tired of others knocking on THEIR doors for guidance and advice.
That is "success" in what they are trying to accomplish...as long as they can fill the need and answer the questions...if not...it would be a terrible curse.
would our leadership be of better quality if they knew they would be held accountable for their decisions, orders and examples they set to their subordinates?
or are they confident/cocky they will never have to answer for their mistakes and do things the way they want to do them as a result of this perhaps shortsighted view on things?.
i mean who is going to police the police so to speak?.
or trying to play follower when called out.
Classic defense...tired too I might add.
are in turmoil?.
i have been watching my witness mother refuse to confront her many problems with my father and brothers...instead running out at every opportunity to knock on her nieghbor's doors and tell them how some men in new york think they should be living their lives and running their household, calling it the "truth"...all while anyone who knows her knows what a mess her home life is.. .
for one i think she should be a bit more selective on what she defines as truth..for two i don't think she can lead by example only empty hypocritical words.. .
perhaps when looking at it and the short term benefits....but when the long term arrives demanding payment...woe is joe.
would our leadership be of better quality if they knew they would be held accountable for their decisions, orders and examples they set to their subordinates?
or are they confident/cocky they will never have to answer for their mistakes and do things the way they want to do them as a result of this perhaps shortsighted view on things?.
i mean who is going to police the police so to speak?.
Then we need to work together to come up with better checks and balances then.
Got any fresh ideas?
http://www.beforeyouhireattorneylawyer.com/.
.
I am tired of depending upon double agents to defend me....you never know who they are really working for when you need them the most.
I have been doing my own work...and asking judges to coach me..with great success.
are in turmoil?.
i have been watching my witness mother refuse to confront her many problems with my father and brothers...instead running out at every opportunity to knock on her nieghbor's doors and tell them how some men in new york think they should be living their lives and running their household, calling it the "truth"...all while anyone who knows her knows what a mess her home life is.. .
for one i think she should be a bit more selective on what she defines as truth..for two i don't think she can lead by example only empty hypocritical words.. .
I have a funny feeling their world IS coming to an end shortly...so that OURS may freely begin.
It is getting old trying to convince and force others to follow our standards....I am of the opinion we need to learn how to develop and follow our own...and doing so to the degree of perfection we don't hurt anyone else in the process of such.
I do not personally wish to follow a group of double agent's standards and rules any longer....I wish to come up with better ones and have them follow MINE!
would our leadership be of better quality if they knew they would be held accountable for their decisions, orders and examples they set to their subordinates?
or are they confident/cocky they will never have to answer for their mistakes and do things the way they want to do them as a result of this perhaps shortsighted view on things?.
i mean who is going to police the police so to speak?.
How about this? People get the leaders they settle for?
Thanks S!
been stumped on this one lately...must one in a position of authority gauge their level of success as how good they are at cheating and using their authority to accomplish their personal plans and adgendas?.
if they would use the intelligence toward finding ways to win the game..instead of new ways to cheat..would the quality of our leadership improve?.
any thoughts?.
Can a double agent make a good babysitter or leader?
